Review





Similar Products

99
ATCC human foreskin fibroblasts hff
Human Foreskin Fibroblasts Hff, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+foreskin+fibroblasts/pmc13092094-59-11-17?v=ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human foreskin fibroblasts hff - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
PromoCell normal human dermal fibroblasts nhdf
In vitro characterization: A) direct cells contact onto film surfaces and CLSM images after 6 days; indirect cell proliferation after 3 and 6 days towards: B) <t>NHDF;</t> C) Caco-2; D) CLSM images (in blue – nuclei; in green – cytoskeleton). (mean values ± SD; n = 3), ANOVA one-way; Scheffé test (* P value <0.05; ***P value <0.001). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Normal Human Dermal Fibroblasts Nhdf, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+foreskin+fibroblasts/pmc13000534-92-8-16?v=PromoCell
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
normal human dermal fibroblasts nhdf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Pasteur Institute human foreskin fibroblast
In vitro characterization: A) direct cells contact onto film surfaces and CLSM images after 6 days; indirect cell proliferation after 3 and 6 days towards: B) <t>NHDF;</t> C) Caco-2; D) CLSM images (in blue – nuclei; in green – cytoskeleton). (mean values ± SD; n = 3), ANOVA one-way; Scheffé test (* P value <0.05; ***P value <0.001). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Human Foreskin Fibroblast, supplied by Pasteur Institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+foreskin+fibroblasts/pmc13266089-109-4-16?v=Pasteur+Institute
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human foreskin fibroblast - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Pasteur Institute human normal foreskin fibroblasts
In vitro characterization: A) direct cells contact onto film surfaces and CLSM images after 6 days; indirect cell proliferation after 3 and 6 days towards: B) <t>NHDF;</t> C) Caco-2; D) CLSM images (in blue – nuclei; in green – cytoskeleton). (mean values ± SD; n = 3), ANOVA one-way; Scheffé test (* P value <0.05; ***P value <0.001). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Human Normal Foreskin Fibroblasts, supplied by Pasteur Institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+foreskin+fibroblasts/pm42286848-82-6-18?v=Pasteur+Institute
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human normal foreskin fibroblasts - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Pasteur Institute human foreskin fibroblast cell line
In vitro characterization: A) direct cells contact onto film surfaces and CLSM images after 6 days; indirect cell proliferation after 3 and 6 days towards: B) <t>NHDF;</t> C) Caco-2; D) CLSM images (in blue – nuclei; in green – cytoskeleton). (mean values ± SD; n = 3), ANOVA one-way; Scheffé test (* P value <0.05; ***P value <0.001). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Human Foreskin Fibroblast Cell Line, supplied by Pasteur Institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+foreskin+fibroblasts/pm42270755-82-1-12?v=Pasteur+Institute
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human foreskin fibroblast cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
PromoCell nhdfs c 12300
In vitro characterization: A) direct cells contact onto film surfaces and CLSM images after 6 days; indirect cell proliferation after 3 and 6 days towards: B) <t>NHDF;</t> C) Caco-2; D) CLSM images (in blue – nuclei; in green – cytoskeleton). (mean values ± SD; n = 3), ANOVA one-way; Scheffé test (* P value <0.05; ***P value <0.001). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Nhdfs C 12300, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+foreskin+fibroblasts/pmc12919959-164-0-12?v=PromoCell
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nhdfs c 12300 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
PromoCell primary normal human dermal fibroblasts hdf
In vitro characterization: A) direct cells contact onto film surfaces and CLSM images after 6 days; indirect cell proliferation after 3 and 6 days towards: B) <t>NHDF;</t> C) Caco-2; D) CLSM images (in blue – nuclei; in green – cytoskeleton). (mean values ± SD; n = 3), ANOVA one-way; Scheffé test (* P value <0.05; ***P value <0.001). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Primary Normal Human Dermal Fibroblasts Hdf, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+foreskin+fibroblasts/pmc13239468-72-0-9?v=PromoCell
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
primary normal human dermal fibroblasts hdf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
PromoCell normal human dermal fibroblasts
In vitro characterization: A) direct cells contact onto film surfaces and CLSM images after 6 days; indirect cell proliferation after 3 and 6 days towards: B) <t>NHDF;</t> C) Caco-2; D) CLSM images (in blue – nuclei; in green – cytoskeleton). (mean values ± SD; n = 3), ANOVA one-way; Scheffé test (* P value <0.05; ***P value <0.001). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Normal Human Dermal Fibroblasts, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+foreskin+fibroblasts/pm42207003-101-0-5?v=PromoCell
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
normal human dermal fibroblasts - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
PromoCell dulbecco
In vitro characterization: A) direct cells contact onto film surfaces and CLSM images after 6 days; indirect cell proliferation after 3 and 6 days towards: B) <t>NHDF;</t> C) Caco-2; D) CLSM images (in blue – nuclei; in green – cytoskeleton). (mean values ± SD; n = 3), ANOVA one-way; Scheffé test (* P value <0.05; ***P value <0.001). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Dulbecco, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+foreskin+fibroblasts/pm42168426-163-29-24?v=PromoCell
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dulbecco - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Evercyte Inc human foreskin fibroblasts fhdf tert166
Evaluation of the biological potential of BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EVs enriched from different collection media. (A) Evaluation of the dose‐dependency of the anti‐inflammatory activity of BM‐MSC/TERT292 EVs enriched from different collection media on NO secretion by LPS‐stimulated BV‐2 cells. LPS‐stimulated BV‐2 cells were treated with increasing EV concentrations ranging from 1E+08 to 2E+09 p/mL. 2.5 µM Dexamethasone (Dexa, green dotted line) was included as positive control. Data are represented as mean ± SD and data were normalised on the LPS‐stimulated BV‐2 cells (set at 100%, red dotted line). (B) Assessment of the anti‐fibrosis effect of BM‐MSC/TERT292 EVs enriched from different collection media on α‐SMA induction by <t>TGF‐β1‐stimulated</t> <t>fHDF/TERT166</t> cells. 20 mM HEPES was included as negative control and 2 µM PP2 was included as positive control. TGF‐β1‐stimulated fHDF/TERT166 cells were treated with a fixed EV concentration of 1E+09 p/mL. (C) Quantification of the wound closure of HUVEC/TERT2 cells upon BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EVs treatment. Wound closure was measured at 0, 16 and 24 h after the removal of culture insert and treatment. 20 mM HEPES was included as negative control and complete expansion medium (Medium + FBS) was included as positive control. HUVEC/TERT2 cells were treated with a fixed EV concentration of 1E+09 p/mL. Data are represented as mean ± SD. One‐way Anova was used for the anti‐inflammatory and anti‐fibrosis assay; data were normalised on the LPS‐stimulated BV‐2 cells and TGF‐β1‐stimulated fHDF/TERT166 cells respectively (set at 100%). Two‐way Anova was used for the Wound Healing assay. Significance is shown as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 ( n = 4 technical replicates for the anti‐fibrosis and anti‐inflammatory assays, n = 3 biological replicates for the wound‐healing assay). (D) Representative microscope images of the HUVEC/TERT2 cells' wound closure 24 h following culture insert removal and treatment (photos were taken at 100× lens magnification).
Human Foreskin Fibroblasts Fhdf Tert166, supplied by Evercyte Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+foreskin+fibroblasts/pmc13178796-51-0-4?v=Evercyte+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human foreskin fibroblasts fhdf tert166 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


In vitro characterization: A) direct cells contact onto film surfaces and CLSM images after 6 days; indirect cell proliferation after 3 and 6 days towards: B) NHDF; C) Caco-2; D) CLSM images (in blue – nuclei; in green – cytoskeleton). (mean values ± SD; n = 3), ANOVA one-way; Scheffé test (* P value <0.05; ***P value <0.001). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Journal: International Journal of Pharmaceutics: X

Article Title: Zein-based polysaccharide-tannic acid films as multifunctional barriers to prevent post-surgical adhesions

doi: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2026.100515

Figure Lengend Snippet: In vitro characterization: A) direct cells contact onto film surfaces and CLSM images after 6 days; indirect cell proliferation after 3 and 6 days towards: B) NHDF; C) Caco-2; D) CLSM images (in blue – nuclei; in green – cytoskeleton). (mean values ± SD; n = 3), ANOVA one-way; Scheffé test (* P value <0.05; ***P value <0.001). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Article Snippet: The in vitro characterization was carried out using normal human dermal fibroblasts (NHDF) from juvenile foreskin (PromoCell, VWR, Milan, Italy) and Human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells (Caco-2).

Techniques: In Vitro

Evaluation of the biological potential of BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EVs enriched from different collection media. (A) Evaluation of the dose‐dependency of the anti‐inflammatory activity of BM‐MSC/TERT292 EVs enriched from different collection media on NO secretion by LPS‐stimulated BV‐2 cells. LPS‐stimulated BV‐2 cells were treated with increasing EV concentrations ranging from 1E+08 to 2E+09 p/mL. 2.5 µM Dexamethasone (Dexa, green dotted line) was included as positive control. Data are represented as mean ± SD and data were normalised on the LPS‐stimulated BV‐2 cells (set at 100%, red dotted line). (B) Assessment of the anti‐fibrosis effect of BM‐MSC/TERT292 EVs enriched from different collection media on α‐SMA induction by TGF‐β1‐stimulated fHDF/TERT166 cells. 20 mM HEPES was included as negative control and 2 µM PP2 was included as positive control. TGF‐β1‐stimulated fHDF/TERT166 cells were treated with a fixed EV concentration of 1E+09 p/mL. (C) Quantification of the wound closure of HUVEC/TERT2 cells upon BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EVs treatment. Wound closure was measured at 0, 16 and 24 h after the removal of culture insert and treatment. 20 mM HEPES was included as negative control and complete expansion medium (Medium + FBS) was included as positive control. HUVEC/TERT2 cells were treated with a fixed EV concentration of 1E+09 p/mL. Data are represented as mean ± SD. One‐way Anova was used for the anti‐inflammatory and anti‐fibrosis assay; data were normalised on the LPS‐stimulated BV‐2 cells and TGF‐β1‐stimulated fHDF/TERT166 cells respectively (set at 100%). Two‐way Anova was used for the Wound Healing assay. Significance is shown as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 ( n = 4 technical replicates for the anti‐fibrosis and anti‐inflammatory assays, n = 3 biological replicates for the wound‐healing assay). (D) Representative microscope images of the HUVEC/TERT2 cells' wound closure 24 h following culture insert removal and treatment (photos were taken at 100× lens magnification).

Journal: Journal of Extracellular Vesicles

Article Title: Role of Collection Media on the Biological Activity of Extracellular Vesicles From hTERT‐Immortalised Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

doi: 10.1002/jev2.70298

Figure Lengend Snippet: Evaluation of the biological potential of BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EVs enriched from different collection media. (A) Evaluation of the dose‐dependency of the anti‐inflammatory activity of BM‐MSC/TERT292 EVs enriched from different collection media on NO secretion by LPS‐stimulated BV‐2 cells. LPS‐stimulated BV‐2 cells were treated with increasing EV concentrations ranging from 1E+08 to 2E+09 p/mL. 2.5 µM Dexamethasone (Dexa, green dotted line) was included as positive control. Data are represented as mean ± SD and data were normalised on the LPS‐stimulated BV‐2 cells (set at 100%, red dotted line). (B) Assessment of the anti‐fibrosis effect of BM‐MSC/TERT292 EVs enriched from different collection media on α‐SMA induction by TGF‐β1‐stimulated fHDF/TERT166 cells. 20 mM HEPES was included as negative control and 2 µM PP2 was included as positive control. TGF‐β1‐stimulated fHDF/TERT166 cells were treated with a fixed EV concentration of 1E+09 p/mL. (C) Quantification of the wound closure of HUVEC/TERT2 cells upon BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EVs treatment. Wound closure was measured at 0, 16 and 24 h after the removal of culture insert and treatment. 20 mM HEPES was included as negative control and complete expansion medium (Medium + FBS) was included as positive control. HUVEC/TERT2 cells were treated with a fixed EV concentration of 1E+09 p/mL. Data are represented as mean ± SD. One‐way Anova was used for the anti‐inflammatory and anti‐fibrosis assay; data were normalised on the LPS‐stimulated BV‐2 cells and TGF‐β1‐stimulated fHDF/TERT166 cells respectively (set at 100%). Two‐way Anova was used for the Wound Healing assay. Significance is shown as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 ( n = 4 technical replicates for the anti‐fibrosis and anti‐inflammatory assays, n = 3 biological replicates for the wound‐healing assay). (D) Representative microscope images of the HUVEC/TERT2 cells' wound closure 24 h following culture insert removal and treatment (photos were taken at 100× lens magnification).

Article Snippet: Human foreskin fibroblasts fHDF/TERT166 (Evercyte GmbH) were cultured in DMEM/F12 (PAN Biotech), supplemented with 10% FBS (PAN Biotech) and 100 μg/mL G418 (InvivoGen).

Techniques: Derivative Assay, Activity Assay, Positive Control, Negative Control, Concentration Assay, Wound Healing Assay, Microscopy

Evaluation of the biological activity of UCM controls. (A) Evaluation of the anti‐inflammatory activity of the different UCM controls on NO secretion by LPS‐stimulated BV‐2 cells. 20 mM HEPES was included as negative control and 2.5 µM Dexamethasone (Dexa) was included as positive control. LPS‐stimulated BV‐2 cells were treated with the same UCM volume of the BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EV enriched in the respective medium (adjusted for the enrichment factor). (B) Assessment of the anti‐fibrosis effect of the different UCM controls on α‐SMA induction by TGF‐β1‐stimulated fHDF/TERT166 cells. 20 mM HEPES was included as negative control and 2 µM PP2 was included as positive control. TGF‐β1‐stimulated fHDF/TERT166 cells were treated with the same UCM volume of the BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EV enriched in the respective medium (adjusted for the enrichment factor). (C) Quantification of the wound closure of HUVEC/TERT2 cells upon TUCM control treatment. Wound closure was measured at 0, 16 and 24 h after the removal of culture insert and treatment. 20 mM HEPES was included as negative control and complete expansion medium (Medium + FBS) was included as positive control. HUVEC/TERT2 cells were treated with the same UCM volume of the BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EV enriched in the respective medium (adjusted for the enrichment factor). Data are represented as mean ± SD. One‐way Anova was used for the anti‐inflammatory and anti‐fibrosis assay; data were normalised on the LPS‐stimulated BV‐2 cells and TGF‐β1‐stimulated fHDF/TERT166 cells respectively (set at 100%). Two‐way Anova was used for the Wound Healing assay. Significance is shown as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 ( n = 4 technical replicates for the anti‐fibrosis and anti‐inflammatory assays, n = 3 biological replicates for the wound‐healing assay). (D) Representative microscope images of the HUVEC/TERT2 cells' wound closure 24 h following culture insert removal and treatment (photos were taken at 100× lens magnification).

Journal: Journal of Extracellular Vesicles

Article Title: Role of Collection Media on the Biological Activity of Extracellular Vesicles From hTERT‐Immortalised Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

doi: 10.1002/jev2.70298

Figure Lengend Snippet: Evaluation of the biological activity of UCM controls. (A) Evaluation of the anti‐inflammatory activity of the different UCM controls on NO secretion by LPS‐stimulated BV‐2 cells. 20 mM HEPES was included as negative control and 2.5 µM Dexamethasone (Dexa) was included as positive control. LPS‐stimulated BV‐2 cells were treated with the same UCM volume of the BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EV enriched in the respective medium (adjusted for the enrichment factor). (B) Assessment of the anti‐fibrosis effect of the different UCM controls on α‐SMA induction by TGF‐β1‐stimulated fHDF/TERT166 cells. 20 mM HEPES was included as negative control and 2 µM PP2 was included as positive control. TGF‐β1‐stimulated fHDF/TERT166 cells were treated with the same UCM volume of the BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EV enriched in the respective medium (adjusted for the enrichment factor). (C) Quantification of the wound closure of HUVEC/TERT2 cells upon TUCM control treatment. Wound closure was measured at 0, 16 and 24 h after the removal of culture insert and treatment. 20 mM HEPES was included as negative control and complete expansion medium (Medium + FBS) was included as positive control. HUVEC/TERT2 cells were treated with the same UCM volume of the BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EV enriched in the respective medium (adjusted for the enrichment factor). Data are represented as mean ± SD. One‐way Anova was used for the anti‐inflammatory and anti‐fibrosis assay; data were normalised on the LPS‐stimulated BV‐2 cells and TGF‐β1‐stimulated fHDF/TERT166 cells respectively (set at 100%). Two‐way Anova was used for the Wound Healing assay. Significance is shown as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 ( n = 4 technical replicates for the anti‐fibrosis and anti‐inflammatory assays, n = 3 biological replicates for the wound‐healing assay). (D) Representative microscope images of the HUVEC/TERT2 cells' wound closure 24 h following culture insert removal and treatment (photos were taken at 100× lens magnification).

Article Snippet: Human foreskin fibroblasts fHDF/TERT166 (Evercyte GmbH) were cultured in DMEM/F12 (PAN Biotech), supplemented with 10% FBS (PAN Biotech) and 100 μg/mL G418 (InvivoGen).

Techniques: Activity Assay, Negative Control, Positive Control, Derivative Assay, Control, Wound Healing Assay, Microscopy

Effect of BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EVs on fHDF/TERT166 proliferation and metabolism upon enrichment in different collection media. (A) Alamar Blue measurement in fHDF/TERT166 cells upon 72 h treatment in Starvation Medium with BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EVs enriched from different collection media. Alamar Blue values were expressed as a percentage of the mean signal from untreated cells (Starvation Medium, set at 100%). (B) Automatic cell count measurement of fHDF/TERT166 cells upon 72 h treatment in Starvation Medium with BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EVs enriched from different collection media. fHDF/TERT166 cells were treated with a fixed EV concentration of 1E+09 p/mL. Data are represented as mean ± SD. One‐way Anova was used, and significance is shown as ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 ( n = 4 technical replicates). (C) Representative microscopy images of Vybrant dye cycle violet stained fHDF/TERT166 cells upon 72 h treatment in Starvation Medium with BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EVs enriched from different collection media. fHDF/TERT166 cells were treated with a fixed EV concentration of 1E+09 p/mL. Scale bars: 250 µm.

Journal: Journal of Extracellular Vesicles

Article Title: Role of Collection Media on the Biological Activity of Extracellular Vesicles From hTERT‐Immortalised Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

doi: 10.1002/jev2.70298

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EVs on fHDF/TERT166 proliferation and metabolism upon enrichment in different collection media. (A) Alamar Blue measurement in fHDF/TERT166 cells upon 72 h treatment in Starvation Medium with BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EVs enriched from different collection media. Alamar Blue values were expressed as a percentage of the mean signal from untreated cells (Starvation Medium, set at 100%). (B) Automatic cell count measurement of fHDF/TERT166 cells upon 72 h treatment in Starvation Medium with BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EVs enriched from different collection media. fHDF/TERT166 cells were treated with a fixed EV concentration of 1E+09 p/mL. Data are represented as mean ± SD. One‐way Anova was used, and significance is shown as ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 ( n = 4 technical replicates). (C) Representative microscopy images of Vybrant dye cycle violet stained fHDF/TERT166 cells upon 72 h treatment in Starvation Medium with BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EVs enriched from different collection media. fHDF/TERT166 cells were treated with a fixed EV concentration of 1E+09 p/mL. Scale bars: 250 µm.

Article Snippet: Human foreskin fibroblasts fHDF/TERT166 (Evercyte GmbH) were cultured in DMEM/F12 (PAN Biotech), supplemented with 10% FBS (PAN Biotech) and 100 μg/mL G418 (InvivoGen).

Techniques: Derivative Assay, Cell Characterization, Concentration Assay, Microscopy, Staining

Effect of UCM controls on fHDF/TERT166 proliferation and metabolism. (A) Alamar Blue measurement in fHDF/TERT166 cells upon 72 h treatment in Starvation Medium with different UCM controls. Alamar Blue values were expressed as a percentage of the mean signal from untreated cells (Starvation Medium, set at 100%). (B) Automatic cell count measurement of fHDF/TERT166 cells upon 72 h treatment in Starvation Medium with different UCM controls. fHDF/TERT166 cells were treated with the same UCM volume of the BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EV enriched in the respective medium (adjusted for the enrichment factor). Data are represented as mean ± SD; One‐way Anova was used, and significance is shown as ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001 ( n = 4 technical replicates). (C) Representative microscopy images of Vybrant dye cycle violet stained fHDF/TERT166 cells upon 72 h treatment in Starvation Medium with the same UCM volume of the BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EV enriched in the respective medium (adjusted for the enrichment factor). Scale bars: 250 µm.

Journal: Journal of Extracellular Vesicles

Article Title: Role of Collection Media on the Biological Activity of Extracellular Vesicles From hTERT‐Immortalised Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

doi: 10.1002/jev2.70298

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of UCM controls on fHDF/TERT166 proliferation and metabolism. (A) Alamar Blue measurement in fHDF/TERT166 cells upon 72 h treatment in Starvation Medium with different UCM controls. Alamar Blue values were expressed as a percentage of the mean signal from untreated cells (Starvation Medium, set at 100%). (B) Automatic cell count measurement of fHDF/TERT166 cells upon 72 h treatment in Starvation Medium with different UCM controls. fHDF/TERT166 cells were treated with the same UCM volume of the BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EV enriched in the respective medium (adjusted for the enrichment factor). Data are represented as mean ± SD; One‐way Anova was used, and significance is shown as ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001 ( n = 4 technical replicates). (C) Representative microscopy images of Vybrant dye cycle violet stained fHDF/TERT166 cells upon 72 h treatment in Starvation Medium with the same UCM volume of the BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EV enriched in the respective medium (adjusted for the enrichment factor). Scale bars: 250 µm.

Article Snippet: Human foreskin fibroblasts fHDF/TERT166 (Evercyte GmbH) were cultured in DMEM/F12 (PAN Biotech), supplemented with 10% FBS (PAN Biotech) and 100 μg/mL G418 (InvivoGen).

Techniques: Cell Characterization, Derivative Assay, Microscopy, Staining

Effect of BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EVs on ROS production and tube formation upon enrichment in different collection media. (A) H2DCFDA measurement in BM‐MSC/TERT292 EVs pre‐treated fHDF/TERT166 cells upon H 2 O 2 —mediated oxidative stress induction. H2DCFDA values were expressed as a percentage of the mean signal from H 2 O 2 only—treated cells (Hepes + H 2 O 2 , set at 100%). A fixed concentration of 5% 20 mM Hepes was kept constant in all wells during the BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EVs pre‐treatment. fHDF/TERT166 cells were treated with fixed EV concentrations of 2.5 E+08 and 1E+09 p/mL. Data are represented as mean ± SD. One‐way Anova was used, and significance is shown as ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 ( n = 4 technical replicates). (B) Evaluation of the tube‐formation ability by HUVEC/TERT2 cells terms of number of segments, (C) number of nodes and (D) total segment length upon BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EVs treatment. HUVEC/TERT2 cells were treated with a fixed concentration of 1E+09 p/mL. Data are represented as mean ± SD. One‐way Anova was used, and significance is shown as ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 ( n = 3 technical replicates). (E) Representative microscopy images of tube formation and image analysis by the Angiogenesis Analyzer plug in of ImageJ in HUVEC/TERT2 cells upon 6 h treatment with BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EVs enriched from different collection media. Nodes are shown as red dots surrounded by a blue circle, branches are coloured in blue, branches in green, master segments in yellow and mashes in light blue.

Journal: Journal of Extracellular Vesicles

Article Title: Role of Collection Media on the Biological Activity of Extracellular Vesicles From hTERT‐Immortalised Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

doi: 10.1002/jev2.70298

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EVs on ROS production and tube formation upon enrichment in different collection media. (A) H2DCFDA measurement in BM‐MSC/TERT292 EVs pre‐treated fHDF/TERT166 cells upon H 2 O 2 —mediated oxidative stress induction. H2DCFDA values were expressed as a percentage of the mean signal from H 2 O 2 only—treated cells (Hepes + H 2 O 2 , set at 100%). A fixed concentration of 5% 20 mM Hepes was kept constant in all wells during the BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EVs pre‐treatment. fHDF/TERT166 cells were treated with fixed EV concentrations of 2.5 E+08 and 1E+09 p/mL. Data are represented as mean ± SD. One‐way Anova was used, and significance is shown as ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 ( n = 4 technical replicates). (B) Evaluation of the tube‐formation ability by HUVEC/TERT2 cells terms of number of segments, (C) number of nodes and (D) total segment length upon BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EVs treatment. HUVEC/TERT2 cells were treated with a fixed concentration of 1E+09 p/mL. Data are represented as mean ± SD. One‐way Anova was used, and significance is shown as ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 ( n = 3 technical replicates). (E) Representative microscopy images of tube formation and image analysis by the Angiogenesis Analyzer plug in of ImageJ in HUVEC/TERT2 cells upon 6 h treatment with BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EVs enriched from different collection media. Nodes are shown as red dots surrounded by a blue circle, branches are coloured in blue, branches in green, master segments in yellow and mashes in light blue.

Article Snippet: Human foreskin fibroblasts fHDF/TERT166 (Evercyte GmbH) were cultured in DMEM/F12 (PAN Biotech), supplemented with 10% FBS (PAN Biotech) and 100 μg/mL G418 (InvivoGen).

Techniques: Derivative Assay, Concentration Assay, Microscopy

Effect of UCM controls on ROS production and tube formation. (A) H2DCFDA measurement in UCM pre‐treated fHDF/TERT166 cells upon H 2 O 2 —mediated oxidative stress induction. H2DCFDA values were expressed as a percentage of the mean signal from H 2 O 2 only—treated cells (Hepes + H 2 O 2 , set at 100%). A fixed concentration of 5% 20 mM Hepes was kept constant in all wells during the UCM pre‐treatment. fHDF/TERT166 cells were treated with the same UCM volume of the BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EV at 1.0E+09 p/mL concentration enriched in the respective medium (adjusted for the enrichment factor). Data are represented as mean ± SD. One‐way Anova was used, and significance is shown as ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 ( n = 4 technical replicates). (B) Evaluation of the tube‐formation ability by HUVEC/TERT2 cells terms of number of segments, (C) number of nodes and (D) total segment length upon UCM controls treatment. HUVEC/TERT2 cells were treated with the same UCM volume of the BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EV enriched in the respective medium (adjusted for the enrichment factor). Data are represented as mean ± SD. One‐way Anova was used, and significance is shown as ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 ( n = 3 technical replicates). (E) Representative microscopy images of tube formation and image analysis by the Angiogenesis Analyzer plug in of ImageJ in HUVEC/TERT2cells upon 6 h treatment with different UCM controls. Nodes are shown as red dots surrounded by a blue circle, branches are coloured in blue, branches in green, master segments in yellow and mashes in light blue.

Journal: Journal of Extracellular Vesicles

Article Title: Role of Collection Media on the Biological Activity of Extracellular Vesicles From hTERT‐Immortalised Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

doi: 10.1002/jev2.70298

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of UCM controls on ROS production and tube formation. (A) H2DCFDA measurement in UCM pre‐treated fHDF/TERT166 cells upon H 2 O 2 —mediated oxidative stress induction. H2DCFDA values were expressed as a percentage of the mean signal from H 2 O 2 only—treated cells (Hepes + H 2 O 2 , set at 100%). A fixed concentration of 5% 20 mM Hepes was kept constant in all wells during the UCM pre‐treatment. fHDF/TERT166 cells were treated with the same UCM volume of the BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EV at 1.0E+09 p/mL concentration enriched in the respective medium (adjusted for the enrichment factor). Data are represented as mean ± SD. One‐way Anova was used, and significance is shown as ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 ( n = 4 technical replicates). (B) Evaluation of the tube‐formation ability by HUVEC/TERT2 cells terms of number of segments, (C) number of nodes and (D) total segment length upon UCM controls treatment. HUVEC/TERT2 cells were treated with the same UCM volume of the BM‐MSC/TERT292‐derived EV enriched in the respective medium (adjusted for the enrichment factor). Data are represented as mean ± SD. One‐way Anova was used, and significance is shown as ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 ( n = 3 technical replicates). (E) Representative microscopy images of tube formation and image analysis by the Angiogenesis Analyzer plug in of ImageJ in HUVEC/TERT2cells upon 6 h treatment with different UCM controls. Nodes are shown as red dots surrounded by a blue circle, branches are coloured in blue, branches in green, master segments in yellow and mashes in light blue.

Article Snippet: Human foreskin fibroblasts fHDF/TERT166 (Evercyte GmbH) were cultured in DMEM/F12 (PAN Biotech), supplemented with 10% FBS (PAN Biotech) and 100 μg/mL G418 (InvivoGen).

Techniques: Concentration Assay, Derivative Assay, Microscopy